<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by franks.:
-1000 is a little too rich for my blood. There are other ways to bet on Klits. But to each his
own as they say. My focus is on the round props.
The greek has it under 6.5 @-165. Someone says Brewster is 255 and a tub of lard. He will fold
quickly. Any thoughts men?<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
5dimes has Klitschko via KO at -275 and fight not going distance at -390.yesterday numbers maybe they changed.
I took the KO in a parlay.
I have Klitschko at -1000 too, but i would not recommend it.
Was Brewster ever down or badly hurt ?
The problem with the under is that Wlad takes his time to minimize risk, but when Brewster comes at him from the beginning it should not last to long, plus you have Brewster via KO too.
-1000 is a little too rich for my blood. There are other ways to bet on Klits. But to each his
own as they say. My focus is on the round props.
The greek has it under 6.5 @-165. Someone says Brewster is 255 and a tub of lard. He will fold
quickly. Any thoughts men?<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
5dimes has Klitschko via KO at -275 and fight not going distance at -390.yesterday numbers maybe they changed.
I took the KO in a parlay.
I have Klitschko at -1000 too, but i would not recommend it.
Was Brewster ever down or badly hurt ?
The problem with the under is that Wlad takes his time to minimize risk, but when Brewster comes at him from the beginning it should not last to long, plus you have Brewster via KO too.
Brewster at +1000 via ko at pinnacle was a reasonable play.
But I believe Vlad will give brewster a beating.
Vlad as low as -610 win only.
One thing is sure and that is that brewster never ever will win a dec against Klitschko (12 rounds).
If you bet brewster take the inside distance option.
But I believe Vlad will give brewster a beating.
Vlad as low as -610 win only.
One thing is sure and that is that brewster never ever will win a dec against Klitschko (12 rounds).
If you bet brewster take the inside distance option.
One thing I've learned through all my years of gambling... NEVER SAY NEVER.
I heard this a lot a few weeks ago.
Monte Barrett will NEVER beat Guinn.
What if Wlad uses his jab to dominate Brewster into the later rounds... now it's a do or die situation for Brewster... so Brewster goes for the ko in round 9... knocks Wlad down 3 or 4 times... Sanders did... but this time, Wlad manages to hand on until the final bell.
Not saying it's going to happen, but never say never.
best,
BK
I heard this a lot a few weeks ago.
Monte Barrett will NEVER beat Guinn.
What if Wlad uses his jab to dominate Brewster into the later rounds... now it's a do or die situation for Brewster... so Brewster goes for the ko in round 9... knocks Wlad down 3 or 4 times... Sanders did... but this time, Wlad manages to hand on until the final bell.
Not saying it's going to happen, but never say never.
best,
BK
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Big-KO:
One thing I've learned through all my years of gambling... NEVER SAY NEVER.
I heard this a lot a few weeks ago.
Monte Barrett will NEVER beat Guinn.
What if Wlad uses his jab to dominate Brewster into the later rounds... now it's a do or die situation for Brewster... so Brewster goes for the ko in round 9... knocks Wlad down 3 or 4 times... Sanders did... but this time, Wlad manages to hand on until the final bell.
Not saying it's going to happen, but never say never.
best,
BK<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
You are right in general.
People who said that Barret couldnt never beat Guinn got carried away, Barrett via dec was a realistc opportunity if you look at the dokiwari fight.
For Brewster to win via dec a LOT of very strange thing must happen. I believe the higher odds for Brewster via KO (nearly double) are worth the risk.
I have seen nearly all of Klitschkos fights and he has lost maybe 6-8 rounds in over 40 fights.
I believe taking the KO option for Brewster if you bet Brewster is very sound advice.
(I bet on Klitschko anyway )
One thing I've learned through all my years of gambling... NEVER SAY NEVER.
I heard this a lot a few weeks ago.
Monte Barrett will NEVER beat Guinn.
What if Wlad uses his jab to dominate Brewster into the later rounds... now it's a do or die situation for Brewster... so Brewster goes for the ko in round 9... knocks Wlad down 3 or 4 times... Sanders did... but this time, Wlad manages to hand on until the final bell.
Not saying it's going to happen, but never say never.
best,
BK<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
You are right in general.
People who said that Barret couldnt never beat Guinn got carried away, Barrett via dec was a realistc opportunity if you look at the dokiwari fight.
For Brewster to win via dec a LOT of very strange thing must happen. I believe the higher odds for Brewster via KO (nearly double) are worth the risk.
I have seen nearly all of Klitschkos fights and he has lost maybe 6-8 rounds in over 40 fights.
I believe taking the KO option for Brewster if you bet Brewster is very sound advice.
(I bet on Klitschko anyway )
